Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20230608"
From solidwiki
(→Discussion on Cooking with Updated Tracking) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
** | ** | ||
− | + | ==Discussion on Cooking with Edge-Finding== | |
update on cooking and tracking check (Mike) | update on cooking and tracking check (Mike) |
Revision as of 09:26, 8 June 2023
Update from Tuesday Analysis/Sim Meeting
- Mike on tracking:
- looks like back/forward tracking can be added to level0 tree but then it needs to be passed onto level 1
- Spencer update on TS3 study, suggestion:
- for data: use individual shower calibrated by MIP, not showersum directly
- for data, run 4680 had SC-A.and.SC-D and SC-A did not work well, should try the newer run
- for sim, separate the 4 particle types and weigh each by the cross section.
- Darren/Zhiwen is working with Kishan on AI/ML
- how does AI/ML PID compare with classical PID for beam test sim?
- how well does the trained ML PID work for beam test data?
- high-level question to be answered by our study:
- is AI/ML PID complimentary to classical method (thus assist classical method), or superior?
- Update on prescale in data:
- (Jixie, W. Gu): CODA3.0 uses power(2,n-1)+1, so n=6 means 33 and for every 33 events, 1 is recorded.
Discussion on Cooking with Updated Tracking
- Presentation by Mike:
Discussion on Cooking with Edge-Finding
update on cooking and tracking check (Mike) update on cooking code (Ye, Jixie, Carter)
update on simulation (Ye)
update from Darren + Spencer
anything else (all)