Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20230818"

From solidwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rate discussion)
(Rate discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Rate discussion=
 
=Rate discussion=
 
*Mike's slides on MIP shift (integral): [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/67/High_Rate_08_17.pdf 08_17]
 
*Mike's slides on MIP shift (integral): [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/67/High_Rate_08_17.pdf 08_17]
*Ye's slides on MIP and baseline shift (height), and expected rate of low-energy background in ECal from beam-on-target simulation
+
*Ye's slides [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/e/ec/081720223_beamtest_update.pdf] on MIP and baseline shift (height), and expected rate of low-energy background in ECal from beam-on-target simulation
 
*suggest for the MIP shift study:
 
*suggest for the MIP shift study:
 
**Ye can apply beam current cut to get baseline (from "before pulse" window) for intermediate beam current values;
 
**Ye can apply beam current cut to get baseline (from "before pulse" window) for intermediate beam current values;

Revision as of 10:56, 20 August 2023

Rate discussion

  • Mike's slides on MIP shift (integral): 08_17
  • Ye's slides [1] on MIP and baseline shift (height), and expected rate of low-energy background in ECal from beam-on-target simulation
  • suggest for the MIP shift study:
    • Ye can apply beam current cut to get baseline (from "before pulse" window) for intermediate beam current values;
    • decompose MIP shift as sum of baseline shift and PMT gain shift. To do so, we need a few plots clearly indicating each component:
  1. plot total MIP peak integral vs beam current (Mike already has this)
  2. use 2D peak integral vs. peak height plot, extract a "time factor", let's call it t_trig
  3. plot baseline vs beam current (Ye already has this but need more current values), expect an exp() function
  4. multiply baseline with "t_trig" then times two (2), plot this vs. beam current; expect an exp() function
  5. plot MIP height (minus baseline) vs. beam current
  6. multiply MIP height (minus baseline) from above with t_trig, plot this vs. beam current
  7. add 4 and 6 from above, do they agree with 1?
  8. check how much horizontal scaling is needed for the Shower histogram to match the 5 uA run (from Ye)
  9. does the scaling from 8 resembles the inverse of the values from 3 above? (make a comparison or plot)
  10. If possible, plot all above vs. background rate instead of beam current (but only if we have a reliable way to get the rate).
  • suggest for rate comparison with beam-on-target simulation:
  1. Can we add a tiny Edep cut, rather than greater than zero?
  2. Can we possibly get this from random trigger FADC raw signals?

SPD timing

  • Carter's slides
  • need to add C-D data, perhaps check the timing propagation