Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20231019"
From solidwiki
(→Discussions) |
(→Update on Radiation) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Update on Radiation== | ==Update on Radiation== | ||
− | *Ye's slides: [] | + | *Ye's slides: [] Converted simulated Edep to radiation dose. |
+ | *Preshower beamtest radiation dose is above SoLID running, but Shower beamtest dose is about half of SoLID running; | ||
+ | *current simulation does not have layer ID of Shower, this is a bit time- and disk- consuming to add. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Pion rejection study== | ||
+ | *Mike's slides: [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/8/81/PID_10_19_2023_v2.pdf PID_Update] | ||
+ | *Good progress, next need to estimate electron and pi0 background in the "clean" pion sample, correct it if possible; then proceed to high rate runs | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Discussions== | ||
+ | *NPS: Some NPS PMTs have begun failing due to a piece in the voltage regulator (part of active base) which is not radiation hard |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 15 February 2024
Update on Radiation
- Ye's slides: [] Converted simulated Edep to radiation dose.
- Preshower beamtest radiation dose is above SoLID running, but Shower beamtest dose is about half of SoLID running;
- current simulation does not have layer ID of Shower, this is a bit time- and disk- consuming to add.
Pion rejection study
- Mike's slides: PID_Update
- Good progress, next need to estimate electron and pi0 background in the "clean" pion sample, correct it if possible; then proceed to high rate runs
Discussions
- NPS: Some NPS PMTs have begun failing due to a piece in the voltage regulator (part of active base) which is not radiation hard