Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20230518"

From solidwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion on Tracking)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==Discussion on Tracking==
 
==Discussion on Tracking==
 
*Presentation by Mike
 
*Presentation by Mike
 +
[[Media:https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/67/Tracking.pdf]]
  
 
==Discussion on Simulation==
 
==Discussion on Simulation==

Revision as of 16:32, 18 May 2023

SoLID ECal Weekly May 18, 2023

Discussion on Tracking

  • Presentation by Mike

Media:https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/6/67/Tracking.pdf

Discussion on Simulation

  • Presentation by Ye

Discussion on Cherenkov

  • Presentation by Darren (simulation)
  • Presentation by Tim (data)

Discussion on AI/ML for PID

  • Presentation by Darren
  • To do:

Discussion on Charged Particle PID Analysis Plan

(Xiaochao)

  • Starting point: 18 deg runs:
    • TS1 = CerSum
    • TS2= SC-B. and. SC-D
    • TS3 = SC-A .and. SC-D → SC-C.and.SC-D.and.ShowerSum
    • TS4 = ShowerSum
  • Select “center-hit” events:
    • use GEM projected position, check that the event has hits in all detectors of the trigger
    • use GEM tracking to select events that hit center of ECal
  • Setup:
    • Obtain preshower and Shower MIP position, convert data to Edep (in MeV)
      • Preshower:
      • Shower:
        • weekly notes say MIP is about FADCint=400, Ye’s slide shows 40 MeV (check: 194*1.5mm*2MeV/cm=58 MeV? Reduction due to Birk effect?). So 1GeV electron → Edep=1GeV*20%sample=200 MeV= 5*40 MeV = 5 * 400 → 2000 in peak integral
        • from Ye’s slide, run 4780 threshold (120mV in TS4) shows up at FADCint=2000; MIP=400 int = 40 MeV Edep = 200 MeV momentum; so 2000 threshold (120mV) → 1 GeV electron; 180 mV → 1.5 GeV/c electron momentum
        • if clear correlation exists between Edep and electron energy, convert FADC peak integral to electron energy: 1 GeV electron energy = 2000 in peak integral
  • PID:
    • use TS3 (or TS4?) compare Psh, Sh, and Cherenkov spectra with simulation
      • Trigger cuts need to be in simulation
      • could use 1 GeV energy (electron-energy equivalent) bin in ShowerSum (better using PSH+SH sum if calibrated)
      • apply Cherenkov cut to see if it makes sense, but I suspect we can’t use Cherenkov to define “clean” electron samples.
      • either with or without Cherenkov cut, apply 1D preshower cut, and 2D preshower+shower (normalized) cut, study electron efficiency and pion rejection.