Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20230831"
From solidwiki
(→Update on rate study) |
(→Update on GEM) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Update on GEM= | =Update on GEM= | ||
| − | *Xinzhan's slides on GEM efficiency correction: | + | *Xinzhan's slides on GEM efficiency correction: [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/File:Hallc_tracking_update_08312023-2.pdf] |
*suggestions: for gain matching, GEM3 both x and y can use some matching (scale up the blue so the lower end align with the red) | *suggestions: for gain matching, GEM3 both x and y can use some matching (scale up the blue so the lower end align with the red) | ||
| + | |||
=Update on rate study= | =Update on rate study= | ||
*Ye's slides: [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a8/08312023_beamtest_update.pdf slides] | *Ye's slides: [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a8/08312023_beamtest_update.pdf slides] | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 2 September 2023
Update on GEM
- Xinzhan's slides on GEM efficiency correction: [1]
- suggestions: for gain matching, GEM3 both x and y can use some matching (scale up the blue so the lower end align with the red)
Update on rate study
- Ye's slides: slides
- suggestions:
- for MIP scaling factor, focus on using runs after the "mysterious" 20% shift; uncertainty in the scaling factor should only be from MIP fit and other similar factors, not the 20% shift of unknown origin.
Other general updates
- Mike worked on getting event/trigger statistics
- Carter continued fitting the timing resolution. Suspect position contribution is to all of T, B, C, and D. Note: C and D are both read out from beam-right only.
- Xiaochao setup overleaf for writing, see link
