Difference between revisions of "SoLID Ecal Weekly 20231005"
From solidwiki
(→Pion rejection study) |
(→Pion rejection study) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Update on Radiation= | =Update on Radiation= | ||
| − | == | + | ==Update on MIP study== |
| − | + | Ye's slides : | |
| + | *To clean up the MIP data sample: | ||
| + | **Baseline shift correction | ||
| + | **Gain shift correction (based on MIP height) | ||
| + | **Fix 40ns as the integral TW in the decoder | ||
| + | **SC_A & SC_D trigger efficiency is very low at ~3%, in order to get pion dominant samples, we need to apply Shower_{i}/ShowerSum>0.8+ 200 ADC<preshower<500 ADC cuts. | ||
| + | **The conclusion is that the MIP peaks we looked at are indeed MIP peaks, there is no confusion about that. | ||
==Discussions== | ==Discussions== | ||
*NPS: Some NPS PMT bases have begun failing due to a component which is not radiation hard | *NPS: Some NPS PMT bases have begun failing due to a component which is not radiation hard | ||
Revision as of 14:01, 23 October 2023
Update on Radiation
Update on MIP study
Ye's slides :
- To clean up the MIP data sample:
- Baseline shift correction
- Gain shift correction (based on MIP height)
- Fix 40ns as the integral TW in the decoder
- SC_A & SC_D trigger efficiency is very low at ~3%, in order to get pion dominant samples, we need to apply Shower_{i}/ShowerSum>0.8+ 200 ADC<preshower<500 ADC cuts.
- The conclusion is that the MIP peaks we looked at are indeed MIP peaks, there is no confusion about that.
Discussions
- NPS: Some NPS PMT bases have begun failing due to a component which is not radiation hard
