Difference between revisions of "FY2022 beam test high rate summary"

From solidwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*ECal PID study (charged electron and pion samples)
 
*ECal PID study (charged electron and pion samples)
 
*We need to study LASPD timing
 
*We need to study LASPD timing
 +
==Test Conditions==
 +
*18 degree test was done during deuteron photo-disintegration experiment
 +
*target: varies; current: up to 60uA
 +
==Run Information==
 +
*Complete run list [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HJXnRIbr646CiAdeprF8JcMBowMJ0t8A/edit?pli=1#gid=1422715418 google spreadsheet]
 +
*Runs divided into conditions: [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1R9CSADssyumREaxqnIwN-hKy_BsLrKc1/edit#slide=id.p1 google slides]
 
==List of Suggested Technical Notes==
 
==List of Suggested Technical Notes==
 
*(Mike/Jimmy) alignment and layout
 
*(Mike/Jimmy) alignment and layout

Revision as of 21:47, 18 May 2023

Goals

  • SPD PID study (need photon samples)
  • ECal PID study (charged electron and pion samples)
  • We need to study LASPD timing

Test Conditions

  • 18 degree test was done during deuteron photo-disintegration experiment
  • target: varies; current: up to 60uA

Run Information

List of Suggested Technical Notes

  • (Mike/Jimmy) alignment and layout
  • (Mike) radiation dosimeter reading
  • (Mike) Runlist (4 plots static for 18 deg linking to dynamic plots, also including 82 and 7 deg), including rates
  • (Darren+someone) Cherenkov analysis
  • (Mike/Zhiwen) summary of rates from preCDR work for each detector (to compare with our beam test)
  • (Jixie) data cooking, pulse finding, integration and deconvolution
  • (Ye) clean sample events – what types of runs to use and how to define them
  • (?) LASPD timing extraction, including "edge-finding" algorithm in decoder